Skip to main content

APPLIANCE DEFECT LAWSUITS


Product Liability Lawyer reviewing appliance defect injury cases and lawsuits for plaintiffs nationwide
Nationwide Success

Defective Home Appliance Injury

investigating defective home appliances: crock pots, pressure cookers, home heaters & food processors

Modern kitchens and laundry rooms house sophisticated machinery designed to simplify daily life. Refrigerators preserve food. Dishwashers sanitize dishes. Dryers transform wet clothing into wearable garments. These mundane tasks happen thousands of times without incident, building confidence that the humming boxes throughout our homes operate safely.

Then, without warning, an ordinary Tuesday transforms into catastrophe. A washing machine ignites. A refrigerator compressor explodes. An oven door shatters, spraying glass across a kitchen where children play. A dryer fire consumes a home while the family sleeps upstairs.

These aren’t freak accidents or acts of divine intervention. They’re predictable outcomes of corporate decisions—choices to use substandard components, skip essential safety testing, or rush products to market before addressing known hazards. When appliances malfunction and cause injury or property destruction, accountability belongs squarely with the companies that manufactured, designed, and sold them.

When Household Conveniences Become Household Hazards: The Truth About Appliance Defects

Most consumers don’t think about all the potentially dangerous kitchen appliances in their homes, yet thousands of Americans are injured by defective home appliances and kitchen products each year.

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), major home appliances cause more than 150,000 residential fires each year, resulting in property damage, serious burn injuries and deaths.

When most people think about kitchen accidents, they may remember the last time they cut themselves with a knife or burned themselves on the stove. But kitchen dangers go far beyond common sense or clumsy mistakes. Defective kitchen products like multi cookers, pressure cookers, food processors, and pot holders are the cause of many burn injuries for consumers.

Consumer safety advocates work hard to force recalls of unsafe kitchen products, but that is more difficult that it appears. Most companies will only recall defective products after kitchen accidents and burn injuries occur. But if you have suffered, contact a product liability attorney to investigate.

Joe Lyon is an experienced burn accident and consumer safety attorney reviewing the most dangerous kitchen appliances and filing kitchen accident lawsuits on behalf of plaintiffs nationwide.

Defective Home Appliances 

Millions of home appliances have been recalled in the last decade for defects that may cause a fire or burn injury. Human error may be a factor in kitchen injuries, though there are hundreds of defective and dangerous kitchen appliances that cause serious burn injuries. The following products and cooking appliances may pose a risk at your home:

The Spectrum of Appliance-Related Catastrophes

Fire represents the most devastating appliance failure mode. Dryers with lint buildup pathways that manufacturers know create fire risks. Refrigerators with defective compressors that overheat and ignite. Dishwashers with faulty wiring that sparks during wash cycles. Ranges with gas leaks that turn homes into potential bombs. These failures destroy property worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and frequently cause severe burn injuries or death.

Electrical malfunctions create another category of danger. Washers that deliver shocks to users touching metal surfaces. Microwaves that continue operating with doors open, exposing families to radiation. Smart appliances with inadequate surge protection that fry home electrical systems. These defects inflict injuries ranging from minor burns to cardiac arrest.

Mechanical failures generate unexpected trauma. Dishwasher doors that fall open, striking children. Garbage disposals that activate without warning, severing fingers. Pressure cookers that explosively release superheated steam, causing third-degree burns. Oven doors that shatter spontaneously, embedding glass shards in users’ skin.

Chemical exposure hazards emerge from appliances that leak refrigerants, release carbon monoxide from incomplete combustion, or off-gas toxic fumes from defective materials. These invisible threats can cause respiratory damage, neurological harm, or poisoning before families realize danger exists.

Following the Money: Why Manufacturers Cut Corners

Appliance companies operate under intense competitive pressure. Retail chains demand lower wholesale prices. Shareholders expect quarterly profit growth. Engineering departments receive mandates to reduce production costs by specific percentages.

This economic environment breeds dangerous decision-making. A safer thermal cutoff switch costs forty-seven cents more per unit—multiply that across a million refrigerators and the “savings” approach half a million dollars. Never mind that the cheaper component fails at higher rates, creating fire risks. The calculation becomes purely financial: lawsuit payouts versus component upgrade costs.

Companies conduct risk-benefit analyses treating human injury as acceptable financial exposure. If predicted lawsuit settlements total less than the expense of redesigning a product or issuing a recall, many manufacturers simply accept the casualties as cost of doing business. This callous arithmetic treats families as collateral damage in pursuit of profit margins.

Building Your Case Against Appliance Manufacturers

Successful product liability claims require proving the appliance contained a defect that directly caused your injuries or property damage. This sounds straightforward but demands substantial investigation and expert analysis.

Preservation of the defective appliance becomes paramount. Never discard damaged units—they constitute your primary evidence. Manufacturers employ sophisticated experts who will scrutinize every component, seeking alternative explanations for failures. You need equally qualified specialists demonstrating that design flaws, manufacturing defects, or inadequate warnings caused the malfunction.

Engineering experts reconstruct failure sequences, identifying the precise component or design element that initiated the catastrophe. Fire investigators determine ignition sources and rule out alternative causes. Medical professionals connect your injuries directly to the appliance failure rather than other potential sources.

Documentation extends beyond the physical appliance. Product manuals, warranty information, purchase receipts, installation records, and maintenance logs all provide crucial context. Photographs of damage scenes, medical records detailing treatments, and financial records showing repair costs build comprehensive damage proof.

Similar incident research often reveals patterns. Your washing machine fire may be the seventeenth involving identical models. Manufacturers sometimes know about defects for years before taking corrective action. Internal company documents—emails between engineers, safety committee meeting minutes, customer complaint databases—can expose corporate knowledge of hazards and decisions to conceal rather than correct them.

CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY

Please complete the form below for a FREE consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
ABOUT THE LYON FIRM

Joseph Lyon has 17 years of experience representing individuals in complex litigation matters. He has represented individuals in every state against many of the largest companies in the world.

The Firm focuses on single-event civil cases and class actions involving corporate neglect & fraud, toxic exposure, product defects & recalls, medical malpractice, and invasion of privacy.

NO COST UNLESS WE WIN

The Firm offers contingency fees, advancing all costs of the litigation, and accepting the full financial risk, allowing our clients full access to the legal system while reducing the financial stress while they focus on their healthcare and financial needs.

photo of attorney Joe Lyon reviewing defective home appliances
A Voice for Those who have suffered 

The Lyon Firm’s Approach to Appliance Defect Cases

Product liability litigation against appliance manufacturers demands attorneys who understand both engineering principles and courtroom strategy. The Lyon Firm has successfully represented families devastated by defective appliances, securing substantial compensation and forcing corporate accountability.

We immediately dispatch investigators to document damage scenes and preserve evidence before it’s lost. Our network includes fire science experts, electrical engineers, metallurgists, and appliance design specialists who provide authoritative testimony about how and why products failed.

These cases require substantial financial investment before any recovery occurs. The Lyon Firm funds all litigation costs—expert fees, testing expenses, document discovery, and trial preparation—without asking clients to pay anything upfront. Our contingency fee arrangement means we only get paid when you do.

CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Questions about Defective Home Appliances

Our homeowner’s insurance covered the fire damage—can we still sue the manufacturer?

Absolutely. Insurance coverage addresses property losses but doesn’t compensate for your injuries, trauma, temporary displacement, or punitive damages against reckless manufacturers. Additionally, your insurance company may have subrogation rights, pursuing the manufacturer to recover what they paid for your property damage.

The appliance was three years old—does that matter legally?

Products should remain safe throughout their expected lifespans. If normal use over three years led to failure, the manufacturer may be liable for designing products with inadequate durability. Age matters less than whether the appliance failed due to inherent defects versus extraordinary abuse or improper maintenance.

We threw away the appliance after the fire department cleared the scene—is our case hopeless?

Not necessarily, though it complicates matters. Fire department reports, photographs, witness testimony, and expert opinions about typical failure modes for that appliance model can still establish liability. However, this illustrates why preserving physical evidence immediately after incidents is so critical.

Can we join a class action if others experienced similar failures?

Class actions suit situations where many people suffered similar economic losses. If your situation involves significant personal injuries or property destruction, individual litigation typically secures better compensation than class action settlement distributions. However, information from class actions about widespread defects can strengthen your individual case.

What if the manufacturer claims we didn’t follow the instruction manual?

Manufacturers must design products that remain safe even when used in reasonably foreseeable ways, including some degree of misuse. If instructions were unclear, buried in dense manuals, or required unrealistic maintenance, those factors support rather than undermine your claim. Additionally, many appliance failures occur despite perfect compliance with all manufacturer guidelines.