Skip to main content

REVISION SURGERY LAWSUITS


Medical Device Lawyer investigates defective medical products for injured plaintiffs nationwide
Nationwide Success

 REVISION SURGERY INJURY LAWYER

When a medical implant or device fails, patients are often forced to undergo revision surgery—a corrective operation meant to remove or replace the defective product. While the procedure is designed to fix earlier problems, it often comes with new risks, extended recovery times, and additional medical costs. For many, these hardships raise the question of whether legal action is possible through a revision surgery injury lawsuit.

With the advent of modern medical devices and joint replacement systems, tens of thousands of Americans are benefiting from new technology and improving their active life. However, many implant and device recipients are unaware of the potential risks involved with some products on the market. Thousands of patients injured by defective medical devices in recent years have been forced into revision surgeries, though able to recover compensation for medical costs and pain and suffering by filing revision surgery lawsuits against negligent device manufacturers.

Revision surgery is usually a more complex procedure than the original implantation. A number of events may lead to a revision surgery, though most include a faulty device or surgeon negligence. The recovery from revision surgeries are typically slow and more painful. Revision surgery presents a risk of complications, including:

Joe Lyon is a highly-rated product liability lawyer and Medical Device Attorney representing plaintiffs nationwide in a wide variety of lawsuits and civil litigation claims. 

Medical Device Failure & Revision Surgery

Joint replacement systems usually involve the implantation of a ceramic, plastic, or metal device into a damaged joint. Most joint implants are considered successful and improve a quality of life for several years.

In best-case scenarios, patients can utilize a joint replacement for up to twenty years. But for many others, there is a chance of device defects and revision surgeries will become necessary. Specific device defects and safety issues include:

  • Structural defects—implant breakage or loosening can cause extreme discomfort and may also limit the full range of joint motion.
  • Implant Wear & Metallosis—if a metal-on-metal medical device is defective, it may cause small metal particles to break off and enter the bloodstream, and result in severe metal poisoning.
  • Joint dislocation & bone fractures—revision surgeries may be needed if a bone or joint is compromised by a faulty device that is leading to further injury.
  • Infection—a serious risk of a revision surgery of any knee and hip replacement includes infection. Post-surgical infection can be quite severe and may affect an entire joint and the surrounding tissue.
  • Device Recall—medical device recalls are quite frequent, and if a certain model presents known health hazards, it may be prudent to have the device removed, and patients will have the option to file lawsuits.

Recalled Medical Devices

Compensation Available

A successful revision surgery injury claim can cover medical bills, ongoing treatment, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In some cases, punitive damages may also be awarded to punish reckless corporate behavior. Beyond financial recovery, lawsuits push manufacturers to improve safety standards, helping protect future patients from similar harm.

CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY

Please complete the form below for a FREE consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
ABOUT THE LYON FIRM

Joseph Lyon has 17 years of experience representing individuals in complex litigation matters. He has represented individuals in every state against many of the largest companies in the world.

The Firm focuses on single-event civil cases and class actions involving corporate neglect & fraud, toxic exposure, product defects & recalls, medical malpractice, and invasion of privacy.

NO COST UNLESS WE WIN

The Firm offers contingency fees, advancing all costs of the litigation, and accepting the full financial risk, allowing our clients full access to the legal system while reducing the financial stress while they focus on their healthcare and financial needs.

photo of attorney Joe Lyon reviewing revision surgeries
A Voice for Those who have suffered

Why are these cases important?

A medical device injury lawsuit can provide crucial financial relief for victims coping with unexpected medical expenses and loss of income. These lawsuits also emphasize corporate responsibility, ensuring companies cannot ignore safety standards. Holding manufacturers accountable often leads to improved products and stronger regulations. Filing a claim not only protects your rights but also helps build a safer healthcare system for future patients who rely on these devices.

CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Questions about Revision Surgery Lawsuits

How is a Medical Device Defined as Defective?

A defective medical device is one that does not meet the safety expectations of its intended use, creating preventable harm for patients. Devices may be deemed defective due to poor design, errors in production, or lack of adequate instructions and warnings. For example, a knee replacement implant that fails early or an insulin pump that malfunctions may qualify as defective. The legal test often considers whether safer alternatives were available and if manufacturers failed to communicate risks. Even FDA approval doesn’t guarantee immunity. If a device compromises patient safety under normal use, the law may consider it defective.

What are some commonly recalled medical devices?

Medical Device Manufacturers


  • Atrium Hernia Mesh
  • Bard Hernia Mesh
  • Bard IVC Filters
  • Covidien Hernia Mesh
  • Depuy Hip Implants
  • Arthrex knee replacement
  • Exactech knee replacement
  • CareFusion ventilators
  • Essure Birth Control System
  • Ethicon hernia mesh
  • Infuse Bone Grafts
  • LivaNova Heater-Coolers
  • Stryker Hip Implants
  • Smith & Nephew Hip Systems
  • Zimmer Biomet Shoulder Systems
  • Wright Medical Hip Implants
What is a failure to warn claim in a medical device lawsuit?

All medical device products come with  warnings and instructions for use that are provided to the physician. If the company does not provide the physician with all the relevant safety data so that the physician adequately understand the risks and benefits of the product, then the medical device is defective. 

The physician must be in a position to pass the appropriate safety data onto the patient, so the patient can make an informed decision on whether they wish to have the medical device implanted.  Patient informed consent is critical because many devices are designed to be permanent.  

Litigation arises where there is evidence the medical device manufacturer failed to timely update a warning in light of new data or simply ignored the risk and failed to conduct sufficient research to identify and then disclose the risk.

In determining whether a medical device is defective due to inadequate warning or instruction, evidence must be presented to prove:

  • The medical device manufacturer knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known about a risk
  • A reasonable medical device manufacturer would have provided a warning of the risk
  • The medical device manufacturer failed to provide the warning
  • The patient was injured due to a lack of warning. The same elements apply whether the claim is based on a warning present during the marketing or post-sale warnings.

Defenses to Failure to Warn Claims(1) the risk was open and obvious or a matter of common knowledge; and (2) in cases of a pharmaceutical drug or medical device, the warning was provided to the prescribing physician (“Learned Intermediary Doctrine”).

What government agency regulates the recall of a medical device?

Design and manufacturing defects result in medical device product recalls each year in the United States, initiated by federal safety agencies.

  • The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)

The foregoing listed government agencies may initiate recalls of dangerous products but do not provide remedies or compensation for damages where an individual is injured due to the defective product. Only litigation can utilized to compensate patients injured by a defective medical device. 

Why should I hire The Lyon Firm?

You should hire The Lyon Firm because of its proven ability to handle complex cases against large corporations. Joe Lyon has successfully represented clients nationwide in product liability, environmental exposure, and serious personal injury lawsuits. What sets the firm apart is its dedication to transparency and client communication. The Lyon Firm doesn’t just focus on legal outcomes—it prioritizes the well-being of clients and their families. By hiring The Lyon Firm, you gain a lawyer who thoroughly investigates every detail, fights aggressively for your rights, and provides compassionate support during a challenging time. Justice and advocacy are its hallmarks.

FAULTY MEDICAL DEVICES

Risks and Consequences
Patients undergoing revision operations face increased chances of infection, nerve injury, blood loss, and even permanent disability. Recovery may take months or years, leaving individuals unable to work or participate in daily activities. These outcomes not only cause physical and emotional distress but also create significant financial strain from repeated hospital visits, rehabilitation, and lost income.

Grounds for Legal Claims
When revision surgery is needed because of a defective device or inadequate warnings from a manufacturer, patients may have grounds for a lawsuit. Legal claims often involve allegations of design defects, errors in manufacturing, or failure to disclose known risks. To succeed, an attorney must connect the defective product directly to the injuries sustained during or after the revision surgery.

Our Victories

The Lyon Firm aggressively, professionally, and passionately advocates for injured individuals and families against companies due to a defective product or recalled product to obtain just compensation under the law. 

IN RE: DEPUY ASR

METAL ON METAL HIP IMPLANTS

Nationwide Consolidation in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio. The Depuy ASR Hip design was plagued with problems related to premature loosening and metallosis, caused by chromium and cobalt entering the blood stream. The resulting injuries were a result of the metal-on-metal friction inherent with the design of the product. Depuy recalled the ASR and entered into a global settlement valued at $2.5 Billion to cover an estimated 8,000 patients. The Lyon Firm represented several clients in the original settlement and continues to be active in this litigation. The settlement funds provided compensation for the revision surgeries, including compensating for medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering.

IN RE: BIOMET MSA MAGNUM

METAL ON METAL HIP IMPLANTS

Nationwide Consolidation in U.S District Court, Northern District of Indiana. Similar to the Depuy ASR, the Biomet metal-on-metal hip design allegedly contributed to premature hip failures and metallosis due to the metal friction. Biomet entered into a global settlement valued at $56 million to cover a few thousand claims. The Lyon Firm represented several plaintiffs in the original settlement and continues to be active in this litigation.