Cord Blood Bank Lawsuits
Deceptive Marketing Class Actions
Private umbilical cord blood banking has become a massive for-profit industry in which individuals and families pay to store blood for potential uses in the future. Consumer protection advocates and deceptive marketing attorneys have expressed multiple concerns regarding the business practices of blood cord banks.
These private blood banks have been accused of overhyping the benefits of cord blood use, particularly with highly speculative and unproven stem cell therapies, some of which are not supported by any convincing clinical evidence. As a result, consumers and plaintiffs around the country have filed cord blood bank lawsuits, alleging misleading marketing and false advertising.
Understanding Cord Blood Banks & Stem Cell Litigation
Despite the claims of many cord blood banks and various clinics offering related stem cell therapy, many of the potential uses remain speculative, and most are unregulated and unapproved by the FDA. Lawyers have argued that future, hypothetical treatments should not be sold recklessly to consumers with bold claims that have not been widely supported by the medical community.
False and misleading claims can easily influence prospective buyers of a product, particularly when a company is manipulating common fears like potential illnesses and future possibilities of disease. Thus, some attorneys and plaintiffs have sued cord blood banks for their misleading claims of the benefits of such products, possibly violating consumer protection laws on fair advertising. These lawsuits can compensate families for the money they have spent on unproven, hypothetical treatments and can help rein in companies that engage in misleading marketing schemes.
Are Cord Blood Banks Making Misleading Claims?
One of the legal issues, according to critics of these programs, is that there are not enough cases of actual, helpful uses to justify selling these services. When parents store a newborn’s umbilical cord blood for potential future use, they spend thousands of dollars, even with risks of contamination. But there exist few potential uses despite the high cost to consumers. That is why some Attorney Generals are calling cord blood banking possibly misleading.
Lawsuits have also alleged that some cord blood banks have made exaggerated claims about the benefits of banking cord blood. Companies have marketed their services for hypothetical future cancer treatments or cures for diseases without strong enough evidence to support their bold claims.
Physicians may also be in line to receive fees for obtaining cord blood samples for banks, creating an alarming potential conflict of interest and incentive to convince consumers to sign up for these services.
There have also been concerns over the storage of large amounts of sensitive personal information like biometrics and personal health information. Data misuse and the mishandling of samples can also lead to legal action.
There are also questions of proper, effective storage, and some question the viability of using cord blood more than ten or fifteen years after collection.
If there are in fact benefits for the sake of stem cell therapies, however, experts in the field have pointed to the advancement of stem cell therapies using adult stem cells, making the idea of banking blood for many years seem unnecessary and wasteful.
The Lyon Firm is a highly-rated product liability and consumer safety law firm headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. We represent plaintiffs nationwide in individual claims and consumer safety class action lawsuits.
If you need consumer protection representation, contact our offices today at (513) 381-2333 for a free, confidential, no-obligation consultation.

CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY
Please complete the form below for a FREE consultation.
ABOUT THE LYON FIRM
Joseph Lyon has 17 years of experience representing individuals in complex litigation matters. He has represented individuals in every state against many of the largest companies in the world.
The Firm focuses on single-event civil cases and class actions involving corporate neglect & fraud, toxic exposure, product defects & recalls, medical malpractice, and invasion of privacy.
NO COST UNLESS WE WIN
The Firm offers contingency fees, advancing all costs of the litigation, and accepting the full financial risk, allowing our clients full access to the legal system while reducing the financial stress while they focus on their healthcare and financial needs.
Can I file a Class Action Cord Blood Bank Lawsuit?
If you believe you were pressured into purchasing a cord blood service or have been misled by false marketing by any company in the healthcare arena, contact our attorneys to investigate your case. We are currently reviewing new stem cell fraud claims and have filed numerous deceptive marketing complaints on behalf of plaintiffs nationwide.
There have been several recent cord blood bank lawsuits filed by individuals and families who feel they purchased services that they now recognize as potentially worthless. One proposed class action lawsuit alleged that CBR Systems charged families thousands of dollars for umbilical cord blood banking services, despite the fact that most cord blood treatments remain unapproved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the complaint, CBR said that of the more than one million cord blood units it has stored, around 700 families have ever used their child’s cord blood for any type of treatment.
Yet, the company has claimed that stem cells within a newborn’s umbilical cord blood and tissue can be used to treat dozens of serious medical conditions in the future. Attorneys have argued that even if that is true, they do not advertise the fact that the blood is used so seldom, and their marketing claims are misleading due to the rarity of actual use.
Arizona Attorney General recently announced she was suing Cord Blood Registry (CBR), and called it a scam. “Instead of offering truly life-saving investment, our complaint alleges that CBR deceived parents about the potential uses and viability of their child’s cord blood and tissue while quietly paying kickbacks to doctors who recommended its services,” said Kris Mayes, the acting AG.
Mayes claims doctors were paid hundreds of dollars in kickbacks for collecting samples, and noted that the cord blood may have even been improperly transported, risking immediate contamination. She notes a lack of transparency in the entire industry, and seeks compensation for consumers who have been misled by cord banks and doctors. Anyone misled by unsubstantiated claims can file a complaint with the Attorney General’s Office.

Contact an Experienced Consumer Fraud Attorney
Consumers have a multitude of rights and protections in the United States, but that doesn’t keep bad actors from trying to defraud customers. Those rights must be guarded and enforced, and filing a consumer fraud lawsuit is one of the most direct ways to hold such companies accountable.
Joe Lyon has represented individuals nationwide in consumer protection class action cases. These include instances of false advertising, deceptive advertising, and other forms of fraudulent marketing claims. If you need an attorney who can provide individualized attention even when taking on a large class-action lawsuit, The Lyon Firm has you covered.
Reach out to us today via our online contact form, or by calling (513) 381-2333. Your communications with us are fully confidential, and your consultation is free of charge. You can rest assured that with The Lyon Firm, the service and dedication we promise are as-advertised.
Consumer Fraud Class Action Lawsuit FAQs
Class actions are typically filed when the amount of money in dispute for a single plaintiff would not justify the expense of litigating the case, but where the amount of damages of the entire class of plaintiffs would justify the cost of litigation. Basically, it’s more cost-effective to get justice for many at once instead of individually, saving everyone massive amounts of time and effort.
Moreover, without class actions, large corporate defendants would be able to cause harm over a large group of individuals without any risk of penalty. These collective cases provide safety in numbers.
- CBR Systems
- Cryo-Cell
- ViaCord
- Americord Registry
- Cleveland Cord Blood Center
- Lifebank (a division of Celularity)
- MD Anderson Cord Blood Bank
- MiracleCord
- Alpha Cord LLC
- PacifiCord
- Stem Cell Cryobank
Class Action Litigation
-
-
Answer a few general questions.
-
A member of our legal team will review your case.
-
We will determine, together with you, what makes sense for the next step for you and your family to take.
-