Auto Defect Attorney
If you’ve been involved in an accident with a malfunctioning autonomous car, such as a Tesla Autopilot or other self-driving vehicle, the aftermath can be overwhelming. These cutting-edge technologies, while innovative, have been linked to numerous incidents—over 736 reported crashes since 2019, including 17 fatalities, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
Navigating the legal complexities of such a case requires a skilled lawyer who understands autonomous vehicle law. This guide will help you find the right legal representation to fight for your rights and secure the compensation you deserve.
Manufacturers of self-driving cars have been arguing for years that in time they will save lives by eliminating driver error from road safety. However, the actual safety of autonomous cars is yet to be determined, and companies could be putting motorists at risk with allegedly faulty, unproven self-driving cars on the road.
Thus far, accident reports show human drivers and automated vehicles are about even in presenting motorists with safety risks.
At the moment, there is not a wealth of data to determine whether or not automation and self-driving cars are actually better at keeping occupants safe. All crash rates are determined by knowing how many non-collisions occur per mile driven.
Assessing crash rates may be extremely difficult to pinpoint. Self-driving cars have logged about 1.2 million miles in total, while normal cars are driven trillions of miles a year. To determine automated vehicle safety, researchers will need to establish a non-collision rate for all driverless vehicles on the road.
Self-driving software does not get tired, intoxicated or experience road rage, but can these cars detect unpredictable and uncertain human driver behavior? Autonomous cars are driving in the moment and do not have the capability to predict events happening further down the road. Also, almost all safety data on self-driving cars is derived in the dry climate and good driving conditions in California and Arizona.
Automated cars are no doubt improving in their ability to operate safer, though perhaps the time has not come for manufacturers to market them as a safe option. Following accidents and injuries involving self-driving cars, victims may be able to file suit against responsible parties.
Joe Lyon is a highly-rated and experienced product liability attorney, well-versed in the economic impact self driving car accidents have on a victim’s life and family.
Self-Driving Car Accidents
Because nobody can ask what self-driving software is thinking, or explain why it will protect car occupants, people are naturally hesitant to put their lives at risk without some human accountability involved.
Tech companies and car companies are doing their best to convince the public that autonomous cars are the safest option for the future, though of course they have a motive of making money from the venture.
Lawmakers are wrestling with how to control this technology. As human-controlled vehicles will remain on the roads for decades to come, is it safe for self-driving vehicles and human drivers to merge safely on the road?
U.S. senators are reviewing the activity of Ford, General Motors, Fiat Chrysler, Google other companies developing self-driving cars. There are concerns about autonomous vehicles and the potential for companies to use forced arbitration clauses in contracts with drivers or passengers to limit the accident liability of carmakers and ride-sharing operations. Recent events like the GM lawsuit and Uber death have highlighted legal issues surrounding autonomous cars.
Some senators and consumer advocates say forced arbitration would prohibit an injured driver or passenger from joining a class-action lawsuit, depriving Americans of legal recourse, and shifting the balance of power in the favor of big business instead of the safety of consumers.
A letter from senators reads: “The innovation driving this technology is exciting, but accountability is critical to ensuring that innovation continues to promote safety first.”
Automakers and self-driving car companies have been put on the spot to answer specific questions about whether they currently use or plan to use forced arbitration provisions, and limit the legal options for American motorists.
Even though self-driving cars may not be directly at fault, test cars are involved in crashes at a higher rate of conventional cars. A study from the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute found that the rate is about twice as high.
The study called “A Preliminary Analysis of Real-World Crashes Involving Self-Driving Vehicles” concluded that even though self-driving cars vehicles were not at fault in many crashes, it appears they are getting in a fair amount of accidents.
CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY
Please complete the form below for a FREE consultation.
ABOUT THE LYON FIRM
Joseph Lyon has 17 years of experience representing individuals in complex litigation matters. He has represented individuals in every state against many of the largest companies in the world.
The Firm focuses on single-event civil cases and class actions involving corporate neglect & fraud, toxic exposure, product defects & recalls, medical malpractice, and invasion of privacy.
NO COST UNLESS WE WIN
The Firm offers contingency fees, advancing all costs of the litigation, and accepting the full financial risk, allowing our clients full access to the legal system while reducing the financial stress while they focus on their healthcare and financial needs.
Autonomous Vehicle Accidents
A motorcyclist in California sued GM stating that a self-driving Chevrolet Bolt, operating in autonomous mode with a backup driver behind the wheel, veered into his lane, striking him and knocking him to the ground in heavy traffic.
Of about 40 crashes involving self-driving vehicles reported to California regulators since January 2017, 33 allegedly involved GM-operated vehicles. After the motorcyclist filed one of several pending autonomous car lawsuits, a GM spokesperson released the following statement: “Safety is our primary focus when it comes to developing and testing our self-driving technology.”
General Motors has been testing autonomous vehicles in San Francisco since August 2017, allowing employees to employ the cars with a backup driver behind the wheel. The vehicles were allegedly involved in six collisions in September 2017. Testing vehicles are operated by GM and liable for any accidents and injuries.
As more self-driving cars take to the streets, lawsuits are inevitable. Law experts expect self-driving tech companies to settle autonomous car lawsuits quickly if they believe their technology is at fault to keep public images clean for a profitable future.
Self-driving cars are outfitted with a system of cameras, radar and sensors that allow them to detect their surroundings: traffic, pedestrians, bicyclists and other obstacles. Testing of autonomous technology has shown driverless cars to be operating safely, though it’s still a work in progress.
The trend in self driving car accident incidents is very concerning for safety agencies. With autonomous systems like driverless cars, pilotless airplanes, and driverless trucks and trains on the horizon, accidents will continue to occur and lawsuits are likely.
Along with GM, Alphabet’s Waymo and Uber have been targeted in personal injury cases, and lawyers are reviewing a case involving car defects from Ford’s autonomous vehicle firm, Argo, which recently injured two people.
Joe Lyon is a highly-rated and experienced product liability lawyer and self driving car accident attorney, well-versed in the economic impact of road injuries and deaths have on a victim’s life and family.
Self-Driving Car Accident Lawsuits
Autonomous car accidents differ from traditional crashes due to the involvement of advanced software and artificial intelligence. This will require a specialized investigation. A malfunctioning system—like failure to detect obstacles or sudden disengagement—can shift liability from the driver to the manufacturer, such as Tesla, Waymo, or GM. Recent lawsuits, including a $243 million verdict against Tesla in Florida, highlight courts’ growing willingness to hold companies accountable for design flaws or misleading marketing about the extent of their vehicles’ self-driving capabilities.
Our lawyers can provide knowledge and experience in the practice areas of product liability, technology law, and personal injury, ensuring they can challenge corporate defenses that often blame drivers. We can gather critical evidence—crash data, software logs, and NHTSA reports—to build a strong case.
Uber and other transport-based companies like Waymo and Lyft started testing driverless cars a few years ago. Some state agencies promised to limit oversight as much as possible and companies began testing robotic vehicles on live roads.
To some lawyers and safety agencies following the development, it came as no surprise when an autonomous car operated by Uber, which included an emergency backup driver behind the wheel, hit and killed a woman on an Arizona street.
Arizona police are working with Uber, the National Transportation Safety Board and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the investigation.
It was perhaps the first pedestrian death associated with a self driving car accident, though experts have voiced their concerns with more accidents that may follow. The accident was a brutal reminder that self-driving auto technology is still experimental and must be regulated.
Despite the death, and other reported accidents, Uber, Lyft and other companies say autonomous cars will be safer than regular cars as they take distracted human driving out of the road safety equation.
Meanwhile, there is a strong pushback from concerned regulators, including Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, who said, “This tragic incident makes clear that autonomous vehicle technology has a long way to go before it is truly safe for the passengers, pedestrians, and drivers who share America’s roads.”
Waymo, the self-driving car unit of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has been testing cars without a human in the driver’s seat. Researchers working with autonomous car technology have struggled with how to program the systems to adjust for erratic human driving behavior.
The National Transportation Safety Board said it was sending investigators to examine “the vehicle’s interaction with the environment, other vehicles and vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and bicyclists.” In 2016, over 37,000 people died in traffic-related accidents in the United States, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
In 2016, a man driving his Tesla on Autopilot, a self-driving feature, died on a state highway in Florida when his car crashed into a semi truck. In another Tesla Autopilot accident lawsuit, a 2025 jury hit the company with a $230 million verdict.
Why should you File a Lawsuit?
Filing a lawsuit following an auto defect-related accident offers numerous compelling benefits, especially in cases involving malfunctioning autonomous systems like Tesla Autopilot. One of the primary advantages is financial compensation, which can cover a wide range of damages caused by the defect. This includes medical expenses such as hospital bills, surgeries, or rehabilitation, lost wages if you’re unable to work, and property damage to your vehicle.
Additionally, you may receive compensation for non-economic losses like pain and suffering, emotional distress, and a diminished quality of life. Beyond personal gain, a lawsuit holds automakers accountable, signaling that negligence in design, manufacturing, or marketing defective vehicles—such as faulty brakes or miscalibrated sensors—won’t be overlooked. Legal action encourages safer technology by pressuring manufacturers to improve testing and safety features, potentially preventing future incidents.
CONTACT THE LYON FIRM TODAY
FAQ about Defects in Autonomous Cars
Yes, if evidence shows the autonomous system failed—e.g., missing a pedestrian or misjudging lanes—you can sue a car manufacturer. The recent Florida Tesla Autopilot case proved courts may share liability between a carmaker and a motorist, making a strong case with expert testimony key.
Consumers can follow recall news or search for current and past recalls on the Web sites of the NHTSA, as well as on other car safety advocate outlets. Look on your car windshield for a 17-character Vehicle Identification Number. Your VIN is also located on your car’s registration card.
If your car has been recalled and you have suffered an injury, contact an auto defect attorney to investigate a potential claim
Auto manufacturers and car makers can be held liable in auto defect lawsuits. Many automakers outsource some of their production and may not always be aware of some defects. Honda, for example, purchased all their defective airbags from Takata.
Some defective auto part suits name other defendants like negligent auto dealerships or auto repair shops who alter car parts or fail to properly repair automobiles and leave a serious safety risk.
In recent years, the most common auto defects have been faulty airbags. Millions of cars were recalled for defective airbags. Other common auto defects are defective throttles, defective car software, and tire failures. Tire failure has been an issue in many car accidents and truck accidents.
A Cincinnati Auto Defect Lawyer can assist in not only reviewing your accident and injury case, but is able to hold large corporations accountable for the negligent actions in releasing unsafe products to the public.
Auto companies must be held liable in order to keep the roads safe in America. So not only can The Lyon Firm seek compensation for injured plaintiffs, but we can file lawsuits to punish car makers for failing to properly test their auto parts before they are sold to the public.
When car makers fail to produce reliable cars and fail to provide basic road safety features, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and product liability attorneys can hold them responsible and help mitigate injuries and future damages.
The majority of accidents and injuries on the road are preventable, but defective auto design and manufacturing defects may leave victims with huge medical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and, in many cases, permanent injuries.
You may recover damages related to medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and punitive damages if negligence is proven.
We aim for a strong settlement early, however these cases may take years to develop, depending on complexity. Early legal action is crucial to preserve evidence and meet deadlines.
Finding the right lawyer can turn a traumatic accident into a path toward justice. Call now for a consultation.
Our Victories
The Lyon Firm aggressively, professionally, and passionately advocates for injured individuals and families against negligent individuals or companies to obtain just compensation under the law.
$1,000,000
WRONGFUL DEATH: DISTRACTED DRIVER
(Brown County, Kentucky): The Lyon Firm was second chair a case involving a driver texting and driving when he crossed the median, killing a father of four. The case was resolved once discovery confirmed the cell phone records proved the texting-related incident. The settlement will pay for the surviving childrens’ education. The driver was likely facing additional criminal charges at the time of the settlement.
$495,000
MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT
(Cincinnati, Ohio): The Lyon Firm was lead counsel in a $495,000 settlement. This case involved a motorcycle operator who sustained fractures of the calcaneus, talus, medial cuneiform, tarsal bones, and tarsometatarsal when a car ignored its driving lane and crossed into his right-of-way. Settlement provided repayment of medical bills of $20,000 and funds for future education to re-enter the work force in a less physically-demanding job.
Auto Personal Injury Information Center
- Tire Failure
- Goodyear Defects
- Bridgestone
- Cooper
- Continental
- Unintended Acceleration
- Throttle
- Hitch Failure
- Autonomous Cars
- Seat Belt Failures
- Auto Repair Negligence
- Car Jacks
- Suspension
- Roof Crush Defects
- Seat Back Failures
- Windshield Wipers
- Keyless Ignition
- Door Latch Failure
- Air Bag Failures
- Rollaway Accidents
- Rollover Accidents
- Collision Avoidance Malfunction
- Emissions
- Emergency Braking Defects
- Wheel Hub Defects
- Fuel Systems
- Polaris
- RV Accidents
- Power Windows
Request A Free Consultation
-
-
Answer a few general questions.
-
A member of our legal team will review your case.
-
We will determine, together with you, what makes sense for the next step for you and your family to take.
-
