Cincinnati Medical Malpractice Attorney
Radiology is a remarkable science that allows our treating physicians to use images to diagnose and treat diseases seen in our body. Examples of radiology include X Rays, MRI’s, CT Scans, and mammograms. Emergency room physicians and other treating physicians utilize radiology to rule out serious injuries and diseases to prevent the progression and to treat any illnesses or injuries appropriately. Therefore, when a radiology error is made, the patient may suffer severe and disabling health consequences through no fault of their own. Yet, radiology departments often experience the highest rates of medical errors in a hospital system.
If you or a loved one has been injured due to radiology malpractice, Joe Lyon is an experienced Cincinnati medical malpractice attorney accepting cases based on radiology malpractice. Offering contingency fees, The Lyon Firm gathers the medical records and the medical experts to evaluate the case and to make a determination as to whether the injury was a result of radiology malpractice.
What Injuries are Caused by Radiology Malpractice?
- Spread of Breast Cancer
- Brain injury due to failure to diagnose
- Failure to diagnose cancer
- Misdiagnosis of heart disease
- Spread of Infection
- Spinal injury resulting in paralysis due to failure to diagnose
- Unnecessary Surgery
- Wrongful Death
Common Radiology Malpractice Cases
- Misread XRays, MRIs or CAT Scans: Overall, approximately “75 percent of all medical malpractice claims against radiologists are related to diagnostic errors,” meaning that three out of four court cases involving radiologists are a result of their direct misdiagnoses of cancer or bone breakages on the film.
- Failure to suggest the next appropriate procedure: According to the American College of Radiology, a Radiologist must suggest follow up or additional diagnostic studies to clarify or confirm impressions when appropriate. Hand-offs from one medical professional to another often result in communication errors. A lack of appropriate medical information or suggestion for follow up is a leading cause of radiology malpractice in the hospital industry.
- Failure to communicate in a timely and clinically appropriate manner: The radiologist is responsible for communicating the results directly to the referring physician. Errors due to communication errors are a common basis of radiology malpractice in Cincinnati Hospitals.
- Fatigue: Length of workdays additionally affect the number of radiology errors. As is common with any worker, job performance may begin to slack as the work day draws to a close, due to mere fatigue resulting from extensive exertion. However, unlike most professions, if a radiologist’s performance falls below the standard of care, it could result in fatal or legal consequences. In fact, studies have been conducted on this one conclusion alone, specifically with radiologists. In the Journal of the American College of Radiology, author Elizabeth Krupinski argues that: “Diagnostic accuracy was reduced significantly after a day of clinical reading… Radiologists have reduced ability to focus, increased symptoms of fatigue and oculomotor strain.”
Radiology Malpractice and Cancer Misdiagnosis
Radiology errors are particularly dangerous where they involve cancer misdiagnosis. Failure to diagnose cancer is a serious medical malpractice issue with staggering implications for radiologists and patients alike.
In 2013, the American Cancer Society forecasted that about 1,660,300 cases would be diagnosed. The first rule in treating cancer is the earlier the diagnosis, the better the chance of a favorable outcome. Unfortunately, many patients are not diagnosed timely and the result is more invasive care, worsening prognosis, and in the some cases an untimely death. Frequently, cancerous lesions on earlier radiographic imaging studies such as mammograms, CAT Scans, MRIs, or X-Rays, but the radiologist did not recognize them for earlier treatment. Where there is a delay due to a radiology error, a medical malpractice lawyer should be contacted to assist in the review of the case and to seek compensation for the damages caused by the misdiagnosis.
Radiology Malpractice and Cancer Misdiagnosis Statistics
The number of delays in diagnosing cancer due to radiology errors is unknown, but based on a review of the medical literature, the statistics suggest it is very high. Several studies published in peer review medical journals have addressed the frequency of radiology errors and found high rates of misdiagnosis. A study conducted over the course of 1981 to 2001 found that “the level of error for clinically significant or major error in radiology is in the range 2-20% and varies depending on the radiological investigation.” In addition, another study that reviewed data over 40 years showed an error rate of 30% for radiologists. Finally, in The World Journal of Radiology, it was disclosed that 30-70 percent of mammograms conducted a second time that show cancerous tumors actually do indicate tumors on the initial misdiagnosed mammogram. That means that up to seven out of ten mammograms are misdiagnosed the first time.
Joe Lyon is a highly rated Cincinnati medical malpractice lawyer. The Lyon Firm can assist you and your family find the answers to the important questions that have gone unanswered. If you would like assistance investigating your potential medical malpractice claim arising from radiology malpractice, for a no-obligation consultation call (800) 513-2403 and you will speak directly with Joe Lyon.
Additional Radiology Malpractice Resources
- Common Client Questions
- Radiology Malpractice Blog
- Goddard, P., et al. “Error in Radiology.” PubMed.gov. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11675313.
- Brady, Adrian, et al. “Discrepancy and Error in Radiology: Concepts, Causes and Consequences.” Ulster Medical Society. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3609674/#b9.
- Pinto, Antonio and Luca Brunese. “Spectrum of Diagnostic Errors in Radiology.” World Journal of Radiology. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2999012/.
“Cancer Facts and Figures 2013.” The American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/research/cancerfactsstatistics/cancerfactsfigures2013/index.
After two hip replacement surgeries, I was informed that one of the prosthesis was the DuPuy Joint and the other was very similar but manufactured by a different company. After several attempts to contact the manufacturer directly to discuss the claim, I was met with bureaucratic red tape that appeared to be insurmountable. I then turned to Joe Lyon of the Lyon Law Firm who immediately cut through the pro I highly recommend Joe if you are faced with the need for this type of litigation.Tim Ross
I met Joe during what was easily one of the worst times of my life. My husband had been in a serious accident and was a quadriplegic following that accident and remained in one medical facility after another until his death nearly four years later. We had contacted an area attorney who told us we absolutely did not have a case. Then we called a Cleveland firm that took the case and brought in Joe. Joe did so much of the work and became just like family to us. I would highly recommend Joe to anyone and be willing to guarantee that he will do anything and everything possible to get satisfactory results. He is extremely dedicated to his clients and very hard working. Mike and I came to think of him like a son, I still do; if it wasn’t for him I don’t believe our case would have been settled the way it was and may have ended up in a courtroom where the results can go any way.Donna Urchak