Cincinnati, Ohio Auto Defect attorney reviewing automated braking defects and defective collision avoidance systems that may lead to accidents and injuries

With the advent of new car safety systems, automakers have pushed out new and improved technology to appeal to the modern consumer. But car safety defects and system malfunction has caused many accidents and road injuries.

As a result, consumer safety advocate sand auto defect lawyers have held car makers responsible for improperly testing new technology before it is installed in automobiles and sold to the public.

Automated emergency braking defects and defective collision avoidance systems have been a major source of stress for car companies that promise better car safety components and more tech-heavy automobiles.

It seems the more advanced  technology has come at a high cost, however. New collision avoidance technology and automated emergency braking systems can be defective and malfunction at inopportune times.

When drivers rely on car safety systems and defective collision avoidance systems, it puts them at risk of rear impact accidents and very serious road injury.

Computer driven cars and crash avoidance sounds like the safer wave of the future, but until car companies can guarantee safe technology, consumers are at risk of auto defects and severe injury.

Joe Lyon is an experienced Ohio auto defect attorney and consumer safety lawyer reviewing automated emergency braking defects and defective collision avoidance systems. 

The Lyon Firm works with accident reconstruction experts and auto engineers to determine the root cause of preventable accidents.

Defective Collision Avoidance & Rear Impact Accidents

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has begun monitoring automatic crash prevention systems due to the number of accident reports. Many cars have safety technology, sensors and cameras that detect objects to avoid.

Avoiding rear end collisions are a priority with the systems, though the safety features do not always function as intended. Forward-crash prevention technology may be able to automatically prevent a rear-end collision about half of the time, but what about the other half? When drivers begin relying on safety features, are they less likely to drive with the same caution?

Lane-Departure Systems and lane-keeping assistance (LKA) are another source of contention among car safety advocates. Sensors are meant to keep drivers safer by alerting them of nearby objects. But malfunctions can be devastating. New technology is intended to avoid accidents, but when it is defective, lawsuits may be filed on behalf of injured plaintiffs.

Safety advocates are pushing for automatic braking in all cars to reduce rear-end collisions, though auto defects are hindering these efforts.

If you or a loved one has suffered an injury due to defective collision avoidance systems, and have questions about the legal remedies available to improve quality of life and medical care, contact The Lyon Firm at (800) 513-2403. You will speak directly with Mr. Lyon, an auto defect attorney, and he will help you answer critical questions regarding auto braking malfunction lawsuits.