Call Us Today

(800) 513-2403

Essure

Essure Permanent Birth Control


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently announced that it will require German drug maker Bayer AG to begin new safety studies on its permanent birth control device Essure.
The FDA also plans to require a “black box” label warning about the device’s potentially serious side effects, something the drug company has resisted in the past. In addition to the new boxed warning, the FDA will require a “Patient Decision Checklist” to help ensure women receive and understand information regarding the risks of this type of device.
Thousands of women have complained about suffering complications from the implant. As a result, women are beginning to speak out and file lawsuits.
Women claim the device has caused permanent injuries including autoimmune diseases, perforated organs and severe pelvic pain.
Among the thousands of reports the FDA had received about Essure, 631 women report becoming pregnant after receiving an Essure implant. Of those, 294 included pregnancy loss.

Recently, experts have questioned the FDA reporting process and have found that risks associated with Essure are significantly higher than reported.

Joe Lyon has represented hundreds of individuals harmed by pharmaceutical products nationwide.  For questions related to the Essure lawsuit call for a no cost consultation (800) 513-2403.


What is Essure?
Essure is a birth control system that over time creates a barrier in the Fallopian tubes that keeps sperm from reaching the eggs, thus preventing conception.
The U.S. FDA approved the Essure Permanent Birth Control System in 2002. Bayer AG, the current manufacturer, says about 1 million of the devices have been sold globally, the majority in the United States.
However, thousands of women are filing lawsuits, and making claims that Essure has caused significant damage to their bodies.
The FDA has received reports of pregnancy losses in women who became pregnant following Essure placement. Bayer admits that women who have had the Essure placement procedure are more likely to have a pregnancy outside the uterus (ectopic pregnancy) than women who have not had the Essure placement procedure. This can be life-threatening.


How does the device work?
The Essure system consists of two metal coils implanted in each Fallopian tube. The device itself is a small, flexible coil made from an alloy of nickel and titanium. A doctor inserts the coils in a procedure that typically takes less than 15 minutes.
Scar tissue is meant to develop in the tube to prevent fertilization. After about three months, tissue is supposed to form around the inserts, blocking the tubes and permanently preventing pregnancy.
While scar tissue forms, women are urged to use an alternative form of birth control.


What are possible complications?
While Bayer markets the Essure system as safe, effective, and “non-invasive,” a study published in the British Medical Journal reports that women who receive an Essure implant are 10 times more likely to need follow-up surgery, compared with women who get their tubes tied.
There are numerous other risks associated with Essure. Bayer acknowledges some risks to patients in its current warning packet, which were reported in clinical trials.
Short-term risks include:
•    Mild to moderate pain
•    Cramping
•    Vaginal bleeding
•    Dizziness
•    Pelvic or back discomfort


Long-term risks include:
•    Unintended pregnancy
•    Pelvic pain
•    Perforation of the uterus or fallopian tubes
•    Migration of Essure inserts through the fallopian tubes or uterus into the lower abdomen and pelvis
Women with the device say the risks go far beyond what Bayer has listed. The FDA has received more than 5,000 formal incident reports about Essure since 2002. The adverse reactions submitted to the FDA include:
•    Allergy or hypersensitivity reactions
•    Joint or muscle pain
•    Muscle weakness
•    Excessive fatigue
•    Hair loss
•    Weight changes
•    Mood changes
•    Persistent fever
•    Abdominal pain
•    Autoimmune disorders
•    Device displacement and breakage
•    Severe pelvic pain
•    Bloating
An Essure insert may migrate into the lower abdomen and pelvis and may require surgery for removal. Women may be forced to get a hysterectomy to remove the device, a procedure that comes with a long set of risks, including injury to the bowel or bladder, and chronic pelvic pain.


New Warnings for Essure
Bayer is facing several lawsuits over Essure, yet it insists the device is effective when inserted properly.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced actions to provide important information about the risks of using Essure.
Dr. William Maisel, chief scientist at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health, stated that “more rigorous research is needed to better understand if certain women are at heightened risk of complications.”
This is not the first time Essure has been questioned by health officials. In the past, the FDA has required updates to the product’s labeling based on clinical trial information and patient reports about the device.
The FDA’s recent decision requires Bayer to conduct a new study designed to “provide important information about the risks of the device in a real-world environment.”
Now the company must follow patients who receive the device, and monitor problems.
This includes noting the rates of complications including unplanned pregnancy, pelvic pain and other symptoms, and surgery to remove the Essure device. The study will also evaluate how much these complications affect a patient’s quality of life.


Public Outrage over Essure

Opponents of the device have waged a social media campaign to see that Essure is pulled from the market. There is a large Facebook group called Essure Problems, where thousands of female members share stories about health problems they have experienced after receiving the device.
The issue is so widespread in communities that congress has also questioned the device and Bayer’s intentions.
Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick, a congressman from Pennsylvania, has pushed the FDA to halt the device’s use. He has asked why the agency would allow Bayer to conduct their own safety studies, rather than have an independent party complete a report.
Even before the latest word from the FDA, Fitzpatrick publicly urged the agency in a letter to review an independent report that counted 303 fetal deaths.
Rep. Rosa DeLauro, from Connecticut added to the pressure by saying recently, “Essure should be off the market until the requested studies are completed.”


Legal Representation

Ohio GM Lawyer

If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to Essure and have questions about the root cause and the legal remedies available to improve quality of life and medical care, contact The Lyon Firm (800) 513-2403.  You will speak directly with Mr. Lyon, and he will help you answer these critical questions

After two hip replacement surgeries, I was informed that one of the prosthesis was the DuPuy Joint and the other was very similar but manufactured by a different company. After several attempts to contact the manufacturer directly to discuss the claim, I was met with bureaucratic red tape that appeared to be insurmountable. I then turned to Joe Lyon of the Lyon Law Firm who immediately cut through the pro I highly recommend Joe if you are faced with the need for this type of litigation.Tim Ross
I met Joe during what was easily one of the worst times of my life. My husband had been in a serious accident and was a quadriplegic following that accident and remained in one medical facility after another until his death nearly four years later. We had contacted an area attorney who told us we absolutely did not have a case. Then we called a Cleveland firm that took the case and brought in Joe. Joe did so much of the work and became just like family to us. I would highly recommend Joe to anyone and be willing to guarantee that he will do anything and everything possible to get satisfactory results. He is extremely dedicated to his clients and very hard working. Mike and I came to think of him like a son, I still do; if it wasn’t for him I don’t believe our case would have been settled the way it was and may have ended up in a courtroom where the results can go any way.Donna Urchak