Call Us Today

(800) 513-2403

Deceptive Food Marketing Targets American Consumers

Consumers Targeted by Deceptive Food Marketing


The largest food and beverage companies in America, including organic food companies, spend billions of dollars to market products to the public each year. Many of these products are damaging to consumers’ health, though are marketed in a much different light. Some of the most unhealthy food and drink products, for example, are marketed as “natural,” though still contain high amounts of preservatives, sodium and sugar.
Major product categories advertised in a deceptive manner commonly include soda and sweetened beverages, sugary cereals, baked goods, snacks, bread, soup, yogurt, and salad dressing. Under federal and state law it is illegal to engage in deceptive marketing, but while such laws exist, deceptive marketing statutes are regularly violated, mostly due to lack of enforcement.
Joe Lyon is a highly rated Cincinnati lawyer representing plaintiffs nationwide in a wide variety of consumer product cases.  


Many Healthy-Sounding Products are Actually Harmful to Consumers

Deceptive food marketing commonly preys on the fear of health-conscious consumers who don’t consider that deceptively healthy terms may appear on the packaging of processed and unhealthy products. Popular food marketing campaigns often use misleading terms like the following:

•    Farm fresh
•    Natural
•    Naturally sweetened
•    Organic
•    Healthy
•    Gluten-free
•    Fruit product


Misleading “Natural” and “Organic” Products

Research shows that most American consumers believe organic foods are healthier than food grown using conventional methods. But an increasing body of evidence shows there is no indication that organic foods lead to better consumer health. Moreover, most people assume that an “organic” or “natural” label means that the food was grown without the use of harmful pesticides, though that is not always the case. Most organic farmers do use pesticides and there are roughly 200 non-organic substances food companies can add to food and still call it “organic.”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) previously stated that “natural” means “nothing artificial or synthetic, including all color additives.” Unfortunately, this directive from the regulation body is too broad, and there still exist thousands of products on the shelves at supermarkets that are “natural” and “organic,” but ultimately very unhealthy.


Food companies Targeted in Recent Lawsuits

  1. Monster Beverage is facing lawsuits over marketing its energy drinks to children as young as six years old, despite scientific research that shows their products may cause health problems, including severe cardiac episodes.
  2. The Quaker Oats Company was sued after its “100% Natural” oatmeal products were found with traces of glysophate, a cancer-causing chemical. A report released by the Alliance for Natural Health USA showed traces in glysophate in several common breakfast foods, including oatmeal, bagels, corn flakes, yoghurt, frozen hash browns, and coffee creamers.
  3. General Mills’ settled a lawsuit over its Fruit Roll-Ups product, for deceptively marketing the candy as a fruit snack. A California court ruled against the company, stating the marketing claim “made with real fruit” incorrectly described the product.
  4. Frito-Lay has recently found itself in court defending their “all natural” packaging claim, which turns out only includes a few of the ingredients, not the product as a whole.

Children Targeted in Unhealthy Food Advertising

Marketing unhealthy products to children is not only unethical, but illegal deception because a child cannot understand how marketing works. One high-profile lawsuit has been filed against McDonald’s directly challenging their marketing tactics to children with their Happy Meals, which include a toy with their fast food.
Children are targets of about 25 percent of the food industry’s advertising budget. Research has shown that children are vulnerable to sugary food advertising, and are unaware that they are even being marketed to. Foods marketed to children are predominantly high in sugar and fat, and ignore any reasonable dietary recommendation. With an obesity problem in the youth today, food companies have a responsibility to refrain from deceptive marketing to the young, vulnerable population.
Yet, food marketers are most interested in youth as current young consumers, and as future adult consumers. Advertisers reach the youth in television advertising, in-school marketing, product placements, and Web sites.


Widespread Deceptive Marketing Tactics

Food and drink companies often mislead consumers with the following deceptive tactics:

  1. Companies take an established brand that has long been low in sugar and market new, sweeter versions of the brand. Breakfast cereals are good examples of this tactic.
  2. Companies use words usually associated with health or fitness to market sugary products. Multiple sports drinks on the market are full of sugar, though marketed as healthy.
  3. Some food companies also add miniscule amounts of nice-sounding ingredients to mask the unhealthy nature of the product. Many juices labeled “100% natural,” for example, can be full of sugar and no more nutritious than a soda. Some low quality juice products contain very little juice at all.

    Take Legal Action against Deceptive Food Marketing

    Several lawsuits have been filed recently against large food companies that intentionally deceive American consumers. Most of these claims are brought by private sector attorneys, who fill the protection gap when the governmental agencies fail to act.


    Legal Representation for Victims of Deceptive Food Marketing

Ohio Deceptive Food Marketing Attorney and Product Liability Lawyer

If you have been the target of deceptive food or drink marketing, and have questions regarding legal action, contact The Lyon Firm (800) 513-2403.You will speak directly with Mr. Lyon, and he will help you answer these critical questions.

After two hip replacement surgeries, I was informed that one of the prosthesis was the DuPuy Joint and the other was very similar but manufactured by a different company. After several attempts to contact the manufacturer directly to discuss the claim, I was met with bureaucratic red tape that appeared to be insurmountable. I then turned to Joe Lyon of the Lyon Law Firm who immediately cut through the pro I highly recommend Joe if you are faced with the need for this type of litigation.Tim Ross
I met Joe during what was easily one of the worst times of my life. My husband had been in a serious accident and was a quadriplegic following that accident and remained in one medical facility after another until his death nearly four years later. We had contacted an area attorney who told us we absolutely did not have a case. Then we called a Cleveland firm that took the case and brought in Joe. Joe did so much of the work and became just like family to us. I would highly recommend Joe to anyone and be willing to guarantee that he will do anything and everything possible to get satisfactory results. He is extremely dedicated to his clients and very hard working. Mike and I came to think of him like a son, I still do; if it wasn’t for him I don’t believe our case would have been settled the way it was and may have ended up in a courtroom where the results can go any way.Donna Urchak