Call Us Today

(800) 513-2403

Atrium’s C-Qur Mesh Causes Severe Adverse Side-Effects

Atrium’s C-Qur Mesh Causes Infection and Other Serious Side Effects

Hernia mesh recipients in recent years have reported severe and debilitating problems following implantation with Atrium C-Qur mesh products. The most common complications include chronic pain, infection, device rejection and hernia recurrence. Atrium was warned years ago about such results, but elected not to recall their mesh device and failed to warn consumers of the risks. Only after allegations and lawsuits began surfacing did Atrium Medical remove some of their C-Qur mesh products from the market.
Lawyers claim Atrium knew or should have known about the potential risks of their mesh products. Rather than prevent further injuries to patients, Atrium went forward and sold defective devices. Many medical professionals stopped using the C-Qur hernia mesh due to high infection rates, bowel obstructions, and systemic allergic reactions.
Joe Lyon is a highly rated product liability lawyer representing plaintiffs nationwide in a wide variety of defective medical device and civil litigation claims.  

Recall of Atrium’s C-Qur Edge Hernia Mesh

In October, 2012, the FDA issued a warning to Atrium Medical, urging the company to address serious complaints related to infections caused by the C-Qur mesh product. Atrium Medical did not properly manage the issues and the FDA responded in 2013 by announcing a recall of the C-Qur Edge mesh.
The recall stated that the Omega 3 oil coating on the mesh could adhere to the packaging due to humidity exposure. Attorneys believe the same C-Qur coating in question has peeled off in patients’ bodies once implanted, and resulted in severe injuries requiring further operations.
The Omega 3 oil coating was originally designed to assist in the patient’s healing process and reduce the chance of the mesh attaching to internal tissues. Results, however, show the gel coatings simply led to further injuries.

Common Mesh Injuries and Complications

The FDA has received serious post-op reports regarding the C-Qur mesh. The Atrium C-Qur mesh failure rates are unacceptably high, and regularly leave patients with permanent and debilitating medical conditions. The C-Qur mesh, made from polypropylene, is known to shrink, cause foreign body reactions, become infected and erode. Patients implanted with a C-Qur mesh device may suffer from the following:
Infection—the Omega 3 fatty acid gel of C-Qur was designed to create a cleaner mesh implant, less likely to attach to organ tissue, but in many cases patients have suffered from serious infections. There is clear indication that the mesh is unsuitable to be used inside the body. If the hernia mesh adheres to the bowel, it can cause gastric ulcers and infections like sepsis and gangrene.
Chronic Pain—discomfort is the most common side effect after a hernia mesh operation. This is understandable, considering the invasiveness of the surgery, but some patients have suffered severe allergic reactions and other patients have experienced pain so severe they are unable to go to work or perform daily chores. Persistent groin pain affects quality of life in every way.
Rejection—C-Qur rejection is most commonly caused by an allergic reaction. The body in many patients is unable to accept the makeup of the mesh material, namely the Omega 3 oil.
Organ Perforation—this may be caused by the C-Qur migrating in the body. Organ perforation is extremely serious and can cause long-term health issues.
Bowel Obstruction—if a mesh device has perforated an organ, it can cause an obstruction of the bowel. This will in turn require an additional surgery.
Patients may also suffer from other side effects including:

•    Adverse foreign body response—inflammation and rashes
•    Additional Surgeries
•    Abnormal Liver Function
•    Nerve damage
•    Neurological changes

Several Models of C-Qur Mesh Devices Could be Defective

Doctors have reported to the FDA certain cases where the oil coating on the mesh peels off during implantation or very soon after implantation. Despite such issues with the C-Qur mesh, Atrium continued to release products made of polypropylene mesh with an outer coating of Omega 3 fatty acid gel.
Atrium has authorized and sold the following types of C-Qur mesh for use in hernia abdominal procedures:
•    C-Qur Edge (officially recalled)
•    C-Qur V-Patch
•    C-Qur Tacshield
•    C-Qur FX
•    C-Qur Mosaic
•    C-Qur Film
•    C-Qur Centrifix
•    C-Qur Lite

Legal Action for Victims of Atrium’s C-Qur Mesh

Atrium currently faces thousands of pending lawsuits. Medical device companies like Atrium have previously paid millions to settle lawsuits when they market and sell defective medical devices, and plaintiffs expect that trend to continue.
Atrium’s C-Qur hernia mesh was not proven safe through testing and as a result an increasing number of claims against Atrium have been filed by injured patients and attorneys. Pending lawsuits allege that Atrium should have known about the risks of dangerous complications, and properly warned patients.

Legal Representation for Victims of the C-Qur Mesh Recall

C-Qur Mesh recall attorney C-Qur Mesh Lawyer for victims of mesh symptoms

If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to a defective Atrium C-Qur hernia mesh product, and have questions about the legal remedies available to improve quality of life and medical care, contact The Lyon Firm (800) 513-2403. You will speak directly with Mr. Lyon, and he will help you answer these critical questions.

After two hip replacement surgeries, I was informed that one of the prosthesis was the DuPuy Joint and the other was very similar but manufactured by a different company. After several attempts to contact the manufacturer directly to discuss the claim, I was met with bureaucratic red tape that appeared to be insurmountable. I then turned to Joe Lyon of the Lyon Law Firm who immediately cut through the pro I highly recommend Joe if you are faced with the need for this type of litigation.Tim Ross
I met Joe during what was easily one of the worst times of my life. My husband had been in a serious accident and was a quadriplegic following that accident and remained in one medical facility after another until his death nearly four years later. We had contacted an area attorney who told us we absolutely did not have a case. Then we called a Cleveland firm that took the case and brought in Joe. Joe did so much of the work and became just like family to us. I would highly recommend Joe to anyone and be willing to guarantee that he will do anything and everything possible to get satisfactory results. He is extremely dedicated to his clients and very hard working. Mike and I came to think of him like a son, I still do; if it wasn’t for him I don’t believe our case would have been settled the way it was and may have ended up in a courtroom where the results can go any way.Donna Urchak