
Environmental misrepresentation lawsuits have been multiplying, and in several complaints plaintiffs have exposed corporations for false and deceptive “eco-friendly” claims. This type of litigation challenges corporate marketing rhetoric that many consumers consider misleading.
At The Lyon Firm, our deceptive marketing attorneys are investigating numerous false advertising claims, and helping clients seek justice and compensation. Contact our legal team to learn more about greenwashing lawsuits and recent settlements. We represent clients nationwide and offer free case reviews.
The term “environmental misrepresentation” refers to the act of making false or misleading claims about the environmental benefits or ecological impact of their products or business practices.
This all-too-common deceptive marketing practice, often overlapping with the broader concept of greenwashing, typically highlights an environmentally friendly image of a company to consumers without properly substantiating those claims with credible evidence or adhering to verifiable environmental standards.
Several related lawsuits have been filed, noting “deliberate deception,” as regulatory bodies and consumers demand greater transparency amid growing pollution and environmental concerns.
Overseas regulations like the EU Green Claims Directive and increasing consumer awareness stateside have fueled recent litigation. Though not always the case, EU environmental statutes are commonly seen as a harbinger of things to come in the U.S. Some recent environmental misrepresentation lawsuits include the following:
Apple Inc. Greenwashing Class Action: Filed on February 26, 2025, in the Central District of California, this complaint accuses Apple of misrepresenting its carbon-neutral status. Plaintiffs allege the company’s supply chain emissions contradict its eco-claims.
Lululemon Athletica “Be Planet” Lawsuit: Plaintiffs claim Lululemon’s “Be Planet” campaign, which touts significant carbon reduction, fails to provide any real evidence of an objective, positive environmental impact.
ExxonMobil Plastic Pollution Lawsuit: California filed a lawsuit against ExxonMobil for allegedly downplaying plastic pollution’s environmental impact and accuse the company of greenwashing the public.
Sugar Industry Greenwashing: Another case filed in California claims the sugar companies, Florida Crystals and the Fanjul Corporation, mislead consumers with “sustainable” labels. The lawsuit claims the companies falsely marketed their products as environmentally friendly, due to pre-harvest sugarcane burning practices that contribute to air pollution.
Proving economic harm is the key to winning these cases. The argument needs to put an exact value on the damages.
Our attorneys believe that greenwashing violations almost always involve companies overvaluing a product under the pretense that the product is more environmentally sustainable. Consumers are willing to pay more for an eco-friendly product, and so companies may take advantage of that behavior.
Taking the first step doesn’t have to be complicated. In just a few minutes, you can share the basics of your case, and our team will guide you from there: