Underinsured Motorist Claim

1.5 million dollar settlement on behalf of family for underinsured motorist claim on behalf of who suffered the loss of their father when a motorist crossed a double yellow line while talking on the phone.

Underinsured Motorist Settlement

1.5 million dollar settlement on behalf of family for underinsured motorist claim on behalf of who suffered the loss of their father when a motorist crossed a double yellow line while talking on the phone.

Related Articles

Auto Dealer Negligence -Defective Suspension

Confidential settlement on behalf of a man who suffered a severe spinal cord injury following an auto accident. It was alleged that the car had a defective right -rear trailing arm that caused the driver to lose control of the car resulting in the accident. The claim focused on the auto dealer's failure to recognize damage to the right rear trialing arm that was affecting the handling of the car. Following discovery and mediation, the case was resolved for a confidential amount.

Read More

Failure to Diagnose Breast Cancer

Confidential settlement on behalf of 38 year old women. Claim alleged a failure to Diagnose and Treat Breast Cancer, and failure to Timely Communicate Lab Results. The failure to diagnose arose from the physician’s failure to communicate a positive biopsy which showed early stages of breast cancer. Had the biopsy been communicated the patient would have been treated with excision and avoided chemotherapy, mastectomy, and had a 95% chance of survival.

Read More

Construction Site Negligence

1.2 million dollar settlement on behalf of worker who suffered a catastrophic amputation of his leg when an excavator inadvertently rolled over him whele he was performing flagging duties. It was alleged that the accident occurred due to negligent design of the construction site, including a lack of signs and organization, negligent training of the driver of the machine, and negligent operation of the machine. The court ruled in favor of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment that the worker was an independent contractor and applied a general negligence standard.

Read More